"Bias varies for bioimpedance analysis and skinfold technique when stra" by Brett S. Nickerson, Ronald L. Snarr et al.
 

Title

Bias varies for bioimpedance analysis and skinfold technique when stratifying collegiate male athletes’ fat-free mass hydration levels

Document Type

Article

Publication Title

Applied Physiology, Nutrition and Metabolism

Abstract

This study evaluated the accuracy of bioimpedance analysis (BIA)-and skinfold (SF)-based body fat percentage estimates in collegiate athletes with varying fat-free mass (FFM) hydration levels. Subjects were evaluated as a whole (n = 63) and at FFM hydration levels of 64.00%–68.99% (FFM-HydrationL1; n = 37) and 69.00%–74.00% (FFM-HydrationL2; n = 26). Proportional bias was absent in the SF technique when stratifying FFM hydration levels. Contrarily, proportional bias was observed when using BIA for FFM-HydrationL1, but not in FFM-HydrationL2. Novelty • Fat-free mass hydration levels impact BIA-based body fat estimates more than skinfold-based body fat.

First Page

336

Last Page

339

DOI

10.1139/apnm-2019-0616

Publication Date

1-1-2020

This document is currently not available here.

Plum Print visual indicator of research metrics
PlumX Metrics
  • Citations
    • Citation Indexes: 4
  • Usage
    • Abstract Views: 5
  • Captures
    • Readers: 23
see details

Share

COinS