Publication Date
Fall 12-1-2021
Document Type
Thesis
Degree Name
Master of Arts in English (MA)
Department
English
Committee Chair
Dr. Manuel Broncano
Committee Member
Dr. Manuel Broncano
Committee Member
Dr. Nathaniel Racine
Committee Member
Dr. Jonathan Murphy
Committee Member
Dr. Monica Muñoz
Abstract
This thesis provides a practical and meaningful reading of Cormac McCarthy’s Blood Meridian or the Evening Redness in the West, one that is rooted in the claim that both Judge Holden and the Kid reflect two different methods for negotiating a tension impinged upon them by their external circumstances. Using a theoretical framework that is inspired by the social psychological Theory of Cognitive Dissonance, this thesis provides an extensive analysis of the novel’s fictional universe, Judge Holden, and the Kid. Such an analysis elucidates the violent nature of Blood Meridian’s universe and further reveals the character of Judge Holden and the kid by means of their actions and behaviors. As demonstrated by both the scope of the judge’s intellectual thought, and his response to the dissentient kid, the judge reflects a method of negotiation that relies on affirming himself as the ultimate agent over existence in order to dismiss his tension. Conversely, the kid reflects a method that entails engaging tension directly, as he takes personal responsibility for reconciling the conflicting ideas of his tension by means of his own actions. Through such an analysis, several important implications for the novel arise, and even a new, ambiguous reading of the novel’s conclusion is made available for the reader to ponder.
Recommended Citation
Pena, Julian, "From the Corner of One's Soul: The Methods of Negotiating Tension in Cormac McCarthy's Blood Meridian or the Evening Redness in the West" (2021). Theses and Dissertations. 179.
https://rio.tamiu.edu/etds/179
Included in
American Literature Commons, Continental Philosophy Commons, Epistemology Commons, Metaphysics Commons