Title
Eliciting information and cues to deceit through sketching in interpreter-based interviews
Document Type
Article
Publication Title
Applied Cognitive Psychology
Abstract
As interviewees typically say less when an interpreter is present, we examined whether this was caused by interpreters not interpreting everything interviewees says or by interviewees providing less information. We further examined (a) the effect of a model drawing on providing information and (b) the diagnostic value of total details and the proportion of complications as cues to deceit. Hispanic, Russian, and South Korean participants were interviewed by native interviewers or by a British interviewer through an interpreter. Truth tellers discussed a trip they had made; liars fabricated a story. Participants received no instruction (condition 1) or were instructed to sketch while narrating without (condition 2) or with (condition 3) being given examples of detailed sketches. Interviewees said less when an interpreter was present because they provided less information. Truth tellers gave more details and, particularly, obtained a higher proportion of complications than liars. The sketching manipulation had no effect.
First Page
1197
Last Page
1211
DOI
10.1002/acp.3566
Publication Date
11-1-2019
Recommended Citation
Vrij, Aldert; Leal, Sharon; Fisher, Ronald P.; Mann, Samantha; Jo, Eunkyung; Shaboltas, Alla; Khaleeva, Maria; Granskaya, Juliana; and Houston, Kate, "Eliciting information and cues to deceit through sketching in interpreter-based interviews" (2019). Social Sciences Faculty Publications. 14.
https://rio.tamiu.edu/soc_sci_facpubs/14